
Podcast – Download the MP3 Here
In April the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation denied Indian Point Nuclear Plant’s application for a water quality certification. In their 28 page letter, the NY DEC told the plant they have no alternative but to install expensive cooling towers to eliminate the plant’s impact on fish and fish larva in the Hudson River.
Power plants of all types (not just nuclear plants) that draw cooling water from bodies of water adversely affect aquatic organisms in three primary ways: thermally by heating the water, by entrainment where small fish and fish larva are sucked into the cooling system and are injured as they pass through, and by impingement where fish are injured by the plant’s intake but not sucked though the cooling system.
The plant had proposed installing “wedge wire screens,” essentially large high tech strainers on the water intake. The screens would virtually eliminate fish impingement, and would reduce entrainment (according to the DEC) by between 72% and 76%. That was not a sufficient reduction in entrainment to satisfy NY State.
The letter covered many issues, but the main reasons they denied the proposal are:
- They said cooling towers are a better option because they would eliminate about 20% more entrainment (at least 90%) than wedge wire screens.
- They said wedge wire screens are still “experimental in nature” and unproven in aquatic environments like the Hudson River, and at nuclear power plants like Indian Point.
- They also stated Indian Point was violating the law by killing endangered shortnose sturgeon by impingement and entrainment.
I would like to address each of these three claims:
First, while it is true that on any given day cooling towers are slightly more effective at eliminating fish and larva entrainment than wedge wire screens. That’s not the whole story. To assess the full benefit to the river one must consider how long each mechanism is in service. Wedge wire screens are relatively easy to install and could be in service within five years. That would mean the screens would be working and reducing entrainment for virtually the full term of Indian Point’s 20 year license extension. Cooling towers on the other hand would require 15 years to permit and build. This means cooling towers would provide no benefit at all for at least 15 years. When you consider the entire remaining life of the plant, wedge wire screens offer far more protection to Hudson River aquatic life.
It is illogical for NY State to object to the use of wedge wire screens one the basis that the technology is experimental and unproven. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency wedge wire screens have been successfully tested in a variety of settings in New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Florida, and Kansas, and on bodies of water including the St John River and the Delaware River in conditions very similar to the Hudson River. In these examples wedge wire screens essentially eliminated impingement and reduced entrainment from 66 to 99%. On the issue of lack of experience at large nuclear plants, from the perspective of the cooling source, the fuel source is irrelevant; steam plants are steam plants. Wedge wire screens have been used at large 770 MW fossil fueled plants. While not quite as large as Indian Point where each of the two reactors is about 1000 MW, the size is in the same ballpark. Keep in mind each unit has it’s own separate intake from the river.
The DEC’s argument that Indian Point is killing endangered sturgeon is so ridiculous that it is
almost hysterical! They should be embarrassed! The current Indian Point nuclear reactors have been on line since the mid-1970’s and during that time the population of shortnosed sturgeon in the Hudson River has INCREASED more than 400% (Sturgeon populations have skyrocketed in the Hudson River since the 1970’s). In fact, the fish population has recovered so much that shortnosed sturgeon are no longer endangered in the Hudson River. The fish is being kept on the endangered species list because it has not yet recovered in other rivers. While it may be true some baby sturgeon and sturgeon eggs are destroyed by the plant’s cooling water system, the impact on the fish population in the river ecosystem is negligible.
Cooling towers have problems of their own. The water in the Hudson River near Indian Point is brackish and contains a good deal of salt. If that water is used in a cooling tower it will emit a considerable amount of salt spray to the immediate vicinity. Salt is corrosive to vehicles, power lines, and building materials. Constant salt spray on vegetation will cause much of it to die, and salt deposition on the ground could make its way into drinking water wells. Turkey Point Nuclear plant in Florida experimented with a saltwater cooling tower many years ago and discovered it defoliated acres of sensitive wetlands. The same thing could happen if cooling towers are installed at Indian Point.
The state is focusing solely on water quality and is failing to consider the overall impact to the environment. Cooling tower construction would force the plant to shutdown for an extended period of time. During that shutdown replacement power would come primarily from coal and natural gas, both of which cause air pollution and greenhouse gasses. In addition, cooling towers emit particulate air pollution of their own.
Why is the NY DEC so insistent that Indian Point Nuclear Plant should install cooling towers? Just follow the money: cooling towers would cost about ten times more than wedge wire screens. Wedge wire screens would provide more benefit over the life of the plant at one-tenth of the cost of cooling towers.
It’s Not About the Environment!
Don’t forget that the New York State Atty General Andrew Cuomo is hard core anti-nuclear. He’s made it very clear he wants the plant to shut down (as a side note, Andrew Cuomo recently announced he is running for governor of New York). The NY position on Indian Point is not about protecting the environment; it is about imposing onerous financial burden on the plant to make it less competitive with the end goal of shutting the plant down for good. In this regard, New York like New Jersey and California is using the state’s authority over water quality permits as a way to raise costs and drive nuclear plants out of the market.
Why is the water quality certificate so important? The clock is ticking; the current operating licenses for the Indian Point rectors will expire in 2013 and 2015. The plant must have a valid water permit from NY State before the NRC can issue a license renewal.
Thankfully, this legal fight is far from over.
John Wheeler


#1 by gmax137 on May 28, 2010 - 2:23 PM
As an outsider (not in the ConEd service area), I almost wish they do shut the units down so those idiots see their electric rates jump.
As a fellow inhabitant of the planet and its atmosphere, I’m appalled that politicians are able to get away with pandering to the idiots. And that they have such sway over matters they do not understand.
We are doomed.
#2 by DocForesight on May 29, 2010 - 6:34 PM
John,
Thank you for that informative explanation of the situation in NY. I have become convinced that many, maybe even most, of the “environmental” groups are not interested in protecting the environment – but instead they bully power companies and extract financial vengeance on them and the customers they serve.
#3 by impartial observer on May 30, 2010 - 4:35 PM
NY uses the market clearing price (mcp) to set rates. The mcp is determined by the marginal cost or operating cost. Because the operating cost for Entergy (and most nuclear plants) is so low, even with an expense of $1B or whatever, electric rates would not rise.
Also, Entergy would not shut the plant down, as it would still be very profitable.
I get the argument made for the wedge wire screens, but how does this address the temperature pollution issues? Has Entergy discussed this? (I’m not trying to make a point, I’m sincerely curious).
As far as the salt water, I believe (hope) those issues must be addressed in the SEQRA analysis.
Sturgeon – If the ESA says they’re endangered, DEC probably doesn’t have a choice. However, there have been cases along the Hudson where variances were given… maybe applicable to all power plants on the Hudson.
#4 by John Wheeler on May 31, 2010 - 9:26 PM
Impartial,
Installation of cooling towers would require Indian Point to be off line for 44 months. During that time power plants in the region that burn coal, oil, and natural gas will be running more regularly to fill the void left by lower cost nuclear generated electricity. This will cause power prices to rise.
In addition, many of Indian Point’s long term customers are municipalities and public owned authorities who benefit from the low cost power and pass those low costs on to NY state residents in the form of lower taxes. If Indian Point is forced to spend $2 Billion for colling towers, they will be forced to recoup those costs from customers. In the end some of the cost will be passed on to taxpayers.
The thermal discharge issue is discussed in detail on pages 12 and 13 of the DEC response. The plant planned to rely on a prior thermal study, but the state disallowed that approach at the last minute. That gave the plant insufficient time to perform a new thermal study during the warmest summer months. The plant’s consultant used thermal data from non-peak times and extrapolated to determine the impact for “worse case” conditions. The state rejected that analysis and said the plant will have to do another thermal study this summer. In general, the thermal impact to the river is very low because the peak flow through the plant’s cooling water system is but a small fraction of total river flow. I can’t find the numbers now but I recall estimates of about 1% of total river flow. The river is a huge body of water more than a mile wide at that point. This means any thermal effects in the river would be very localized and would be dissipated quickly as the water moved away from the plant.
#5 by Thomas Clegg on June 17, 2010 - 5:34 PM
John if you look up short nose sturgeon they lay their eggs in fresh water somewhere around Coxsackie’s NY. about 60 to miles from IP. The larva are bad swimmers and stay alive in fresh water. So their eggs and larvae could NOT be getting sucked into IP’s intake. Another lie put out buy anti-nukes. Same with shad except that they lay their eggs above Troy NY. Over 100 miles from IP. One of the best places to fish in NY. is lake Ontario. There are 16 nuclear power plants on lake Ontario. Only one has a cooling tower. So the NY state DEC is trying to tell me that 15 nuclear power plants effect the fish population less than tow nuclear power plants then two nuclear power plants on the Hudson. What part of our bodies is NY state DEC trying to blow smoke up? Buy the way IP effects less than 1% of the Hudson.